header-logo header-logo

01 October 2025
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Lammy sets out priorities at Labour conference

Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed his commitment to expanding intensive supervision courts and stood up for legal aid lawyers, in his speech to Labour Conference

Addressing party delegates in Liverpool this week, Lammy said the specialist courts would help offenders break free from a cycle of reoffending. He praised legal aid lawyers for ‘serving their communities for much less than they could earn elsewhere’.

Lammy used the speech to announce he will launch a ‘New English Law Panel’ to champion and promote English law and legal services across the world. The panel will be ‘uniting voices across the sector to promote English law worldwide as a gold standard that drives growth.’

Lammy also criticised his Conservative shadow Robert Jenrick MP for ‘smearing our independent judiciary from the pub on X’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll