header-logo header-logo

03 March 2011
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Land registration—Adverse possession—Procedure

Baxter v Mannion [2011] EWCA Civ 120, [2011] All ER (D) 235 (Feb)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Mummery, Jacob and Tomlinson LJJ, 22 Feb 2011

A person who has not in fact been in adverse possession is simply not entitled to apply to register title under para 1(1) of Sch 6 to the Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA 2002).

Helen Galley (instructed by MA Law LLP) for the applicant.
Tom Weeks (instructed by Taylor Vinters) for the respondent.

M purchased a field in 1996 and was duly registered as its proprietor. Over the years, B made some use of the field by way of keeping horses on it. In 2005, B applied to the Land Registry (the Registry) for registration of the field in his name under para 1(1) of Sch 6 to LRA 2002. He claimed to have been in adverse possession of the field since 1985. He supported the application with a statutory declaration to that effect. The Registry approved the application and sent a notice to M, as required by s 2(1)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll