header-logo header-logo

Land registration—Adverse possession—Procedure

03 March 2011
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Baxter v Mannion [2011] EWCA Civ 120, [2011] All ER (D) 235 (Feb)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Mummery, Jacob and Tomlinson LJJ, 22 Feb 2011

A person who has not in fact been in adverse possession is simply not entitled to apply to register title under para 1(1) of Sch 6 to the Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA 2002).

Helen Galley (instructed by MA Law LLP) for the applicant.
Tom Weeks (instructed by Taylor Vinters) for the respondent.

M purchased a field in 1996 and was duly registered as its proprietor. Over the years, B made some use of the field by way of keeping horses on it. In 2005, B applied to the Land Registry (the Registry) for registration of the field in his name under para 1(1) of Sch 6 to LRA 2002. He claimed to have been in adverse possession of the field since 1985. He supported the application with a statutory declaration to that effect. The Registry approved the application and sent a notice to M, as required by s 2(1) of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll