header-logo header-logo

28 January 2026
Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Leasehold , Property
printer mail-detail

Land tenure revolution begins

Property lawyers have given a cautious welcome to the government’s landmark Bill capping ground rents at £250, banning new leasehold properties and making it easier for leaseholders to switch to commonhold

The Draft Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill, laid before Parliament this week, will phase out ground rents over 40 years and replace forfeiture—where leaseholders can lose their home by defaulting on a debt as low as £350—with a fairer debt enforcement system. 

The government estimates about 770,000 to 900,000 leaseholders currently pay more than £250 per year in ground rent.

Housing secretary Steve Reed launched a simultaneous consultation, ‘Moving to commonhold: banning leasehold for new flats’, seeking views on timing, transitional arrangements, exemptions and costs. It ends on 24 April.

Mark Chick, senior partner at Bishop & Sewell and director, Association of Leasehold Enfranchisement Practitioners (ALEP), said: ‘This Draft Bill represents the most substantial shift in land tenure for more than two centuries.

‘There is clear political and public pressure to accelerate change, but reforms of this magnitude must balance speed with care. Rushed legislation rarely delivers clarity or certainty. Similar comments apply to the proposed cap and eventual sunset on ground rents which will potentially be susceptible to Human Rights Act challenges, although the government has been at pains to set out its approach in a policy statement for this very reason.’

Liam Spender, head of real estate litigation at Velitor Law and campaigner for leaseholder rights, said there may be disappointment that ground rents are not being eliminated immediately but, ‘crucially the cap will make it cheaper for people to buy the freehold and to extend their leases, both of which are priced by reference to ground rent values’.

Anna Favre, partner at Cripps, said the reform would, ‘quite rightly, assist leaseholders enduring the injustice of unusually onerous escalating ground rents.

‘However, it will also retrospectively alter long established contractual income streams relied upon by other landlords and institutional investors. The challenge lies in ensuring that the ground rent cap and wider leasehold reforms are implemented in a way that preserves confidence in UK as a stable investment class while delivering fair outcomes for homeowners.’

Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Leasehold , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll