header-logo header-logo

28 January 2026
Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Leasehold , Property
printer mail-detail

Land tenure revolution begins

Property lawyers have given a cautious welcome to the government’s landmark Bill capping ground rents at £250, banning new leasehold properties and making it easier for leaseholders to switch to commonhold

The Draft Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill, laid before Parliament this week, will phase out ground rents over 40 years and replace forfeiture—where leaseholders can lose their home by defaulting on a debt as low as £350—with a fairer debt enforcement system. 

The government estimates about 770,000 to 900,000 leaseholders currently pay more than £250 per year in ground rent.

Housing secretary Steve Reed launched a simultaneous consultation, ‘Moving to commonhold: banning leasehold for new flats’, seeking views on timing, transitional arrangements, exemptions and costs. It ends on 24 April.

Mark Chick, senior partner at Bishop & Sewell and director, Association of Leasehold Enfranchisement Practitioners (ALEP), said: ‘This Draft Bill represents the most substantial shift in land tenure for more than two centuries.

‘There is clear political and public pressure to accelerate change, but reforms of this magnitude must balance speed with care. Rushed legislation rarely delivers clarity or certainty. Similar comments apply to the proposed cap and eventual sunset on ground rents which will potentially be susceptible to Human Rights Act challenges, although the government has been at pains to set out its approach in a policy statement for this very reason.’

Liam Spender, head of real estate litigation at Velitor Law and campaigner for leaseholder rights, said there may be disappointment that ground rents are not being eliminated immediately but, ‘crucially the cap will make it cheaper for people to buy the freehold and to extend their leases, both of which are priced by reference to ground rent values’.

Anna Favre, partner at Cripps, said the reform would, ‘quite rightly, assist leaseholders enduring the injustice of unusually onerous escalating ground rents.

‘However, it will also retrospectively alter long established contractual income streams relied upon by other landlords and institutional investors. The challenge lies in ensuring that the ground rent cap and wider leasehold reforms are implemented in a way that preserves confidence in UK as a stable investment class while delivering fair outcomes for homeowners.’

Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Leasehold , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Trowers & Hamlins—Rahul Sagar

Trowers & Hamlins—Rahul Sagar

Banking and finance practice bolstered by partner hire

mfg Solicitors—Ian Sheppard

mfg Solicitors—Ian Sheppard

Commercial litigation team welcomes senior associate in Birmingham

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll