header-logo header-logo

28 January 2026
Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Leasehold , Property
printer mail-detail

Land tenure revolution begins

Property lawyers have given a cautious welcome to the government’s landmark Bill capping ground rents at £250, banning new leasehold properties and making it easier for leaseholders to switch to commonhold

The Draft Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill, laid before Parliament this week, will phase out ground rents over 40 years and replace forfeiture—where leaseholders can lose their home by defaulting on a debt as low as £350—with a fairer debt enforcement system. 

The government estimates about 770,000 to 900,000 leaseholders currently pay more than £250 per year in ground rent.

Housing secretary Steve Reed launched a simultaneous consultation, ‘Moving to commonhold: banning leasehold for new flats’, seeking views on timing, transitional arrangements, exemptions and costs. It ends on 24 April.

Mark Chick, senior partner at Bishop & Sewell and director, Association of Leasehold Enfranchisement Practitioners (ALEP), said: ‘This Draft Bill represents the most substantial shift in land tenure for more than two centuries.

‘There is clear political and public pressure to accelerate change, but reforms of this magnitude must balance speed with care. Rushed legislation rarely delivers clarity or certainty. Similar comments apply to the proposed cap and eventual sunset on ground rents which will potentially be susceptible to Human Rights Act challenges, although the government has been at pains to set out its approach in a policy statement for this very reason.’

Liam Spender, head of real estate litigation at Velitor Law and campaigner for leaseholder rights, said there may be disappointment that ground rents are not being eliminated immediately but, ‘crucially the cap will make it cheaper for people to buy the freehold and to extend their leases, both of which are priced by reference to ground rent values’.

Anna Favre, partner at Cripps, said the reform would, ‘quite rightly, assist leaseholders enduring the injustice of unusually onerous escalating ground rents.

‘However, it will also retrospectively alter long established contractual income streams relied upon by other landlords and institutional investors. The challenge lies in ensuring that the ground rent cap and wider leasehold reforms are implemented in a way that preserves confidence in UK as a stable investment class while delivering fair outcomes for homeowners.’

Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Leasehold , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll