header-logo header-logo

The land trap

11 July 2014 / Nicholas Asprey
Issue: 7614 / Categories: Features , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail
specialist_property_asprey

A recent decision has had a suprising effect on provisions for rectifying the land register. Nicholas Asprey reports

Schedule 4 to the Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA 2002) contains provisions for “alteration” of the land register, but Fitzwilliam v Richall Holdings Services Ltd [2013] EWHC 86 (Ch) concerns that species of alteration which is defined in para 1 as “rectification”, namely alteration which:

  1. involves the correction of a mistake; and
  2. prejudicially affects the title of a registered proprietor.

Paragraph 2 gives the court power to make an order for alteration of the register for the purpose of correcting a mistake. Paragraph 3 relates to rectification.

Paragraph 3(2) provides that no order may be made under paragraph 2 without the proprietor’s consent in relation to land in his possession unless (a) he has by fraud or lack of proper care caused or substantially contributed to the mistake, or (b) it would for any other reason be unjust for the alteration not to be made.

Paragraph 3(2) therefore gives special protection to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll