header-logo header-logo

Landlord and tenant

29 April 2010
Issue: 7415 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Aviva Life Pensions UK Ltd (formerly known as Norwich Union Life and Pensions) v Linpac Mouldings Ltd and others [2010] EWCA Civ 395, [2010] All ER (D) 147 (Apr)

A tenant’s right to utilise a break clause was limited to the original tenant. At no time had a court interpreted a contractual provision as conferring on a person a right to break a lease at a time when they were neither the landlord nor the tenant. Competent property advisors needed to take particular care to make unambiguously clear, if intended, that a person would be entitled to break a lease not only when they were a tenant, but even after they had assigned the lease.

Although the object of all interpretation was to identify the intention of the parties to the particular document in question, it was undesirable that the courts should reach radically different interpretations of break clauses in commercial leases based on slight differences in language which were not obviously intended to achieve different objectives.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll