header-logo header-logo

29 April 2010
Issue: 7415 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Landlord and tenant

Aviva Life Pensions UK Ltd (formerly known as Norwich Union Life and Pensions) v Linpac Mouldings Ltd and others [2010] EWCA Civ 395, [2010] All ER (D) 147 (Apr)

A tenant’s right to utilise a break clause was limited to the original tenant. At no time had a court interpreted a contractual provision as conferring on a person a right to break a lease at a time when they were neither the landlord nor the tenant. Competent property advisors needed to take particular care to make unambiguously clear, if intended, that a person would be entitled to break a lease not only when they were a tenant, but even after they had assigned the lease.

Although the object of all interpretation was to identify the intention of the parties to the particular document in question, it was undesirable that the courts should reach radically different interpretations of break clauses in commercial leases based on slight differences in language which were not obviously intended to achieve different objectives.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll