header-logo header-logo

Lap dancing clubs: is one too many?

22 July 2022 / Zia Akhtar
Issue: 7988 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
88165
Sex entertainment venues: Zia Akhtar reports on local authority licensing powers & the ‘nil cap’ policy
  • The issue of sexual entertainment venues spans a wide spectrum of legal issues, including environmental, employment and local authority concerns, all of which impact on the licensing of the industry.
  • A number of local councils have effectively enacted bans of such venues by implementing the ‘nil cap’ policy (thereby restricting the number of permitted venues to zero).

Lap dancing clubs are classified under s 27 of the Policing and Crime Act 2009 (PCA 2009) as ‘sexual entertainment venues’ (SEVs). They were licensed to operate under the local authority’s power to grant them a licence and the entertainment they offered was any live performance or display of nudity for the purpose of ‘sexually stimulating’ any member of the audience.

The ban by Edinburgh City Council on all strip clubs in March 2022 (against which the United Sex Workers union has now sought to launch a legal challenge) and the ongoing public consultation issued

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll