header-logo header-logo

LASPO campaign continues

10 May 2012
Issue: 7513 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Royal Assent fails to dampen fight against legal aid cuts in new Act

Legal groups have vowed to press on with their fight against legal aid cuts, despite the fact that the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) is now on the statute books.

Legal Action Group (LAG) director Steve Hynes said campaign work could focus on s 92 of LASPO, which gives the government discretion to bring areas of the law back into scope. It could be used, for example, to re-instate legal aid for family law if the family courts were unable to cope.

“We see that as an opportunity,” says Hynes.

LASPO gained Royal Assent last week after a bumpy ride through the House of Lords. Legal aid will cease to be available for many areas of family and civil law from April 2013. Hynes says: “It is a misconceived and unjust piece of legislation and we will be continuing to campaign against it.

“It’s very vague; for example, we have yet to see the exact wording of the regulations around domestic violence. The provision on ‘exceptional cases’ is the catch-all part of the legislation and we think lawyers will push this as far as possible.

“When there are legal aid changes, there is always a period where the law is not settled and there are lots of challenges, judicial reviews and pushing at the boundaries. We will be encouraging that as much as possible.”

He says LAG plans to “make it an election issue” for the 2015 general election.

Carol Storer, director of the Legal Aid Practitioners Group, says she understands the government is expecting there to be “thousands” of “exceptional cases” each year—currently, about 200 are funded annually.

“There are a huge amount of grey areas,” she says. “People will be deciding whether they can make a viable business out of this, and may have to lay off staff in April. What happens to the client when the entire housing team leaves? The case may be classed as remainder work and continue to be funded but there will be nobody there to do it.”

A Legal Services Commission spokesperson says work begun before April 2013 could continue after that date under the terms of the old contract. If a firm’s housing team leave next April then any ongoing certificated work, although not legal help, can be transferred to a new firm.
 

Issue: 7513 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll