header-logo header-logo

10 May 2012
Issue: 7513 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

LASPO campaign continues

Royal Assent fails to dampen fight against legal aid cuts in new Act

Legal groups have vowed to press on with their fight against legal aid cuts, despite the fact that the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) is now on the statute books.

Legal Action Group (LAG) director Steve Hynes said campaign work could focus on s 92 of LASPO, which gives the government discretion to bring areas of the law back into scope. It could be used, for example, to re-instate legal aid for family law if the family courts were unable to cope.

“We see that as an opportunity,” says Hynes.

LASPO gained Royal Assent last week after a bumpy ride through the House of Lords. Legal aid will cease to be available for many areas of family and civil law from April 2013. Hynes says: “It is a misconceived and unjust piece of legislation and we will be continuing to campaign against it.

“It’s very vague; for example, we have yet to see the exact wording of the regulations around domestic violence. The provision on ‘exceptional cases’ is the catch-all part of the legislation and we think lawyers will push this as far as possible.

“When there are legal aid changes, there is always a period where the law is not settled and there are lots of challenges, judicial reviews and pushing at the boundaries. We will be encouraging that as much as possible.”

He says LAG plans to “make it an election issue” for the 2015 general election.

Carol Storer, director of the Legal Aid Practitioners Group, says she understands the government is expecting there to be “thousands” of “exceptional cases” each year—currently, about 200 are funded annually.

“There are a huge amount of grey areas,” she says. “People will be deciding whether they can make a viable business out of this, and may have to lay off staff in April. What happens to the client when the entire housing team leaves? The case may be classed as remainder work and continue to be funded but there will be nobody there to do it.”

A Legal Services Commission spokesperson says work begun before April 2013 could continue after that date under the terms of the old contract. If a firm’s housing team leave next April then any ongoing certificated work, although not legal help, can be transferred to a new firm.
 

Issue: 7513 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll