header-logo header-logo

LASPO campaign continues

10 May 2012
Issue: 7513 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Royal Assent fails to dampen fight against legal aid cuts in new Act

Legal groups have vowed to press on with their fight against legal aid cuts, despite the fact that the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) is now on the statute books.

Legal Action Group (LAG) director Steve Hynes said campaign work could focus on s 92 of LASPO, which gives the government discretion to bring areas of the law back into scope. It could be used, for example, to re-instate legal aid for family law if the family courts were unable to cope.

“We see that as an opportunity,” says Hynes.

LASPO gained Royal Assent last week after a bumpy ride through the House of Lords. Legal aid will cease to be available for many areas of family and civil law from April 2013. Hynes says: “It is a misconceived and unjust piece of legislation and we will be continuing to campaign against it.

“It’s very vague; for example, we have yet to see the exact wording of the regulations around domestic violence. The provision on ‘exceptional cases’ is the catch-all part of the legislation and we think lawyers will push this as far as possible.

“When there are legal aid changes, there is always a period where the law is not settled and there are lots of challenges, judicial reviews and pushing at the boundaries. We will be encouraging that as much as possible.”

He says LAG plans to “make it an election issue” for the 2015 general election.

Carol Storer, director of the Legal Aid Practitioners Group, says she understands the government is expecting there to be “thousands” of “exceptional cases” each year—currently, about 200 are funded annually.

“There are a huge amount of grey areas,” she says. “People will be deciding whether they can make a viable business out of this, and may have to lay off staff in April. What happens to the client when the entire housing team leaves? The case may be classed as remainder work and continue to be funded but there will be nobody there to do it.”

A Legal Services Commission spokesperson says work begun before April 2013 could continue after that date under the terms of the old contract. If a firm’s housing team leave next April then any ongoing certificated work, although not legal help, can be transferred to a new firm.
 

Issue: 7513 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll