header-logo header-logo

09 January 2019
Issue: 7823 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

LASPO in real life

Online stories show cruel realities of life without legal aid

The Bar Council has published a video on the tragic story of Nicholas Harry’s struggle to fund legal representation for the inquest into the death of his 19-month old son, Sam, as part of a series on real-life examples of hardship caused by legal aid cuts.

Sam was killed either by his mother or his mother’s partner in 2013. Harry had earlier sold his house and taken out a loan in order to fund his legal case for custody (also removed from scope of legal aid funding in 2013), fearing his son was in danger, but was unsuccessful. A prosecution was unsuccessful, so Harry felt the inquest was his only chance to get answers. He again borrowed money to pay a lawyer. In the video, he says: ‘Without a solicitor, I’d still be thinking to this day, “what didn’t I ask?”’

Another video tells the story of Mary-Ellen, a nurse and homeowner forced to stop work in 1994 due to a debilitating health condition, whose care package was unlawfully cut from 12 hours to two hours. Prior to April 2013, she would have been eligible for legal aid as benefits are her only income but the enactment of LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) meant the value of her home was taken into consideration, pushing her over the threshold. She could either sell her (specially adapted) home or access justice. Her solicitor agreed to act for free.

The videos are part of a series by the Bar Council and media platform openDemocracy showing the cruel realities of LASPO on openDemocracy’s Voices for Justice pages this month. The project includes interviews with charity workers and MPs such as Bob Neill and Bambos Charalambous and addresses a range of issues including custody disputes, disability rights and benefits, homelessness, Windrush and early legal advice.

LASPO removed legal aid from vast swathes of civil law, including inquests, private family law, benefits law, housing and employment. The government is due to hold its long-awaited review of the legislation this year. Last summer, it consulted on providing legal aid for inquest proceedings where the state is involved.

Issue: 7823 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
back-to-top-scroll