header-logo header-logo

18 November 2020
Issue: 7911 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Last chance for EU deal

With time almost up for the UK to secure an agreement with the EU, a senior lawyer warned that, deal or no deal, ‘the outcome is not binary’

The transition period ends at 11pm on 31 December 2020. However, MEPs will vote to accept or reject the deal, and have said they need six weeks for the deal to be scrutinised, pass through committee and pass through the full plenary vote. The vote is scheduled for 16 December, although it is widely reported discussions have taken place about a possible extraordinary sitting of the European Parliament on 28 December.  

The deal must also be approved by MPs. Sticking points in negotiations reportedly include fishing rights, mechanisms for resolving disputes, fair competition rules for business and rules on domestic subsidies.

Hogan Lovells partner Charles Brasted said: ‘We know that no deal will be comprehensive. 

‘The scope of any deal, and the extent to which it pushes off the detail to later, will determine how much will change on 1 January. One thing that we know will change is how many rules are interpreted and applied in the UK.

‘Vast amounts of previously EU-derived law and regulation in the UK will be on a new legal footing from 1 January 2021 and potentially open to reinterpretation in its new post-Brexit context. Businesses in the UK whose operations are currently affected by EU law should take notice and be prepared to manage the risks and capitalise on the opportunities that could arise from this legal uncertainty. 

‘Any area of law, regulation or policy in the UK previously touched by EU law, is potentially affected. Businesses and their advisors cannot assume that familiar laws and rules will not become faux amis.’

During the transition period, EU law has mainly continued to apply in the UK as before.

Issue: 7911 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll