header-logo header-logo

18 November 2020
Issue: 7911 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Last chance for EU deal

With time almost up for the UK to secure an agreement with the EU, a senior lawyer warned that, deal or no deal, ‘the outcome is not binary’

The transition period ends at 11pm on 31 December 2020. However, MEPs will vote to accept or reject the deal, and have said they need six weeks for the deal to be scrutinised, pass through committee and pass through the full plenary vote. The vote is scheduled for 16 December, although it is widely reported discussions have taken place about a possible extraordinary sitting of the European Parliament on 28 December.  

The deal must also be approved by MPs. Sticking points in negotiations reportedly include fishing rights, mechanisms for resolving disputes, fair competition rules for business and rules on domestic subsidies.

Hogan Lovells partner Charles Brasted said: ‘We know that no deal will be comprehensive. 

‘The scope of any deal, and the extent to which it pushes off the detail to later, will determine how much will change on 1 January. One thing that we know will change is how many rules are interpreted and applied in the UK.

‘Vast amounts of previously EU-derived law and regulation in the UK will be on a new legal footing from 1 January 2021 and potentially open to reinterpretation in its new post-Brexit context. Businesses in the UK whose operations are currently affected by EU law should take notice and be prepared to manage the risks and capitalise on the opportunities that could arise from this legal uncertainty. 

‘Any area of law, regulation or policy in the UK previously touched by EU law, is potentially affected. Businesses and their advisors cannot assume that familiar laws and rules will not become faux amis.’

During the transition period, EU law has mainly continued to apply in the UK as before.

Issue: 7911 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
back-to-top-scroll