header-logo header-logo

Laughing gas: not so funny after all?

28 April 2023 / Dr Olubunmi Onafuwa , Dr Michael Harrison
Issue: 8022 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail
120629
While nitrous oxide abuse is no joke, is criminalising the drug the right move? Dr Michael Harrison & Dr Olubunmi Onafuwa caution against a heavy-handed approach to the laughing gas problem

Nitrous oxide (commonly known as laughing gas) is a drug that is commonly used as an anaesthetic and analgesic in dentistry and surgery. However, it is also used recreationally to produce euphoria and hallucinations. When nitrous oxide is inhaled repeatedly or used in combination with other drugs, it can cause serious health problems, such as vitamin B12 deficiency, nerve damage, and death.

In 2016, two defendants were acquitted after being charged with possession of nitrous oxide in Taunton. Their defence barrister successfully argued that the substance is a medicinal product and is commonly used during childbirth. The prosecution relied on the Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 (PSA 2016) which makes the production, supply, and importation of nitrous oxide for recreational consumption illegal. However, it does not cover possession, because it qualifies as a medical product.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll