header-logo header-logo

28 April 2023 / Dr Olubunmi Onafuwa , Dr Michael Harrison
Issue: 8022 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Laughing gas: not so funny after all?

120629
While nitrous oxide abuse is no joke, is criminalising the drug the right move? Dr Michael Harrison & Dr Olubunmi Onafuwa caution against a heavy-handed approach to the laughing gas problem

Nitrous oxide (commonly known as laughing gas) is a drug that is commonly used as an anaesthetic and analgesic in dentistry and surgery. However, it is also used recreationally to produce euphoria and hallucinations. When nitrous oxide is inhaled repeatedly or used in combination with other drugs, it can cause serious health problems, such as vitamin B12 deficiency, nerve damage, and death.

In 2016, two defendants were acquitted after being charged with possession of nitrous oxide in Taunton. Their defence barrister successfully argued that the substance is a medicinal product and is commonly used during childbirth. The prosecution relied on the Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 (PSA 2016) which makes the production, supply, and importation of nitrous oxide for recreational consumption illegal. However, it does not cover possession, because it qualifies as a medical product.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll