header-logo header-logo

Laughing gas: not so funny after all?

28 April 2023 / Dr Olubunmi Onafuwa , Dr Michael Harrison
Issue: 8022 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail
120629
While nitrous oxide abuse is no joke, is criminalising the drug the right move? Dr Michael Harrison & Dr Olubunmi Onafuwa caution against a heavy-handed approach to the laughing gas problem

Nitrous oxide (commonly known as laughing gas) is a drug that is commonly used as an anaesthetic and analgesic in dentistry and surgery. However, it is also used recreationally to produce euphoria and hallucinations. When nitrous oxide is inhaled repeatedly or used in combination with other drugs, it can cause serious health problems, such as vitamin B12 deficiency, nerve damage, and death.

In 2016, two defendants were acquitted after being charged with possession of nitrous oxide in Taunton. Their defence barrister successfully argued that the substance is a medicinal product and is commonly used during childbirth. The prosecution relied on the Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 (PSA 2016) which makes the production, supply, and importation of nitrous oxide for recreational consumption illegal. However, it does not cover possession, because it qualifies as a medical product.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll