header-logo header-logo

Law Commission recommends extending protected characteristics

22 September 2020
Issue: 7903 / Categories: Legal News , Equality
printer mail-detail
Women should be protected under hate crime laws, the Law Commission has suggested

Currently, the law treats a criminal offence as more serious if the victim is targeted for one of five protected characteristics―race, religion, sexual orientation, disability and transgender identity. The Commission proposes adding sex or gender to the list, primarily to protect women from crimes linked to misogyny.

The extra category would be added as part of an overhaul of hate crime laws, which the Commission says is inconsistent and lacking in clarity.

The Commission is considering including other characteristics, such as age. It also wants to expand the offence of racist chanting at football matches to cover homophobic chanting and behaviour such as gestures and throwing missiles at players.

Professor Penney Lewis, Criminal Law Commissioner, said: ‘Hate crime has no place in our society.’

Dr Loretta Trickett, Associate Professor at Nottingham Law School said: ‘The Law Commission recommendations that sex or gender become a protected characteristic under hate crime law will be welcome by many in the UK.  It means that existing criminal offences such as public order, assaults, harassment and criminal damage can be treated more seriously if targeted against someone on the basis of their sex or gender. 

‘The obvious example is misogyny against women and girls which fuels their harassment and abuse and has for too long limited their use of public and virtual spaces.  Misogyny is a root case of violence against women and girls and is a social problem that requires eradication and the law needs to take a lead on this.  This will now help inform a longer-term educational drive to eliminate misogyny against women and girls enabling them to partake in public life with fear of abuse and harassment simply because of their gender.’

View the consultation, ‘Hate crime’, which ends on 24 December, at: www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/hate-crime.

Issue: 7903 / Categories: Legal News , Equality
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll