header-logo header-logo

Trade marks

18 September 2008
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Honda Motor Europe Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) [2008] All ER (D) 35 (Sep)

Under Art 8 of reg 40/94 (opposition to the registration of a trademark by the proprietor of an earlier trade mark), the risk that the public might believe that the goods or services in question come from the same undertaking or from economically-linked undertakings, constitutes a likelihood of confusion. Account should be taken of the similarity between the trade marks and between the goods or services.

The global assessment of the likelihood of confusion should be based on the overall impression given by the marks, bearing in mind their distinctive and dominant components.

A complex trade mark could be regarded as being similar to another trade mark which is identical or similar to one of the components of the complex mark, unless that component forms the dominant element within the overall impression created by the complex mark (as where that component was, by itself, likely to dominate the image of that mark which the relevant public kept in mind, with the result that all the other components of the mark were negligible within the overall impression created by it).

The more distinctive the earlier mark, the greater is the likelihood of confusion and therefore marks with a highly distinctive character, either per se or because of the recognition they possess on the market, enjoy broader protection than marks with a less distinctive character.
 

Issue: 7337 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll