header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
29 May 2008 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7323 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest , Immigration & asylum , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Immigration

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

SK (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 495, [2008] All ER (D) 190 (May)

Rule 22 of the Immigration Tribunal (Procedure) Rules 2005 (SI 2005/230) provides only for a written determination. Although it is within the powers of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal to pronounce an oral decision, it is the written determination which constitutes the formal determination.

 

Issue: 7323 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest , Immigration & asylum , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur ruling sparks fresh calls for litigation overhaul
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
NLJ this week: Hidden assets & financial remedies proceedings
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
NLJ this week: Deferred prosecution agreements enter a new era
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
NLJ this week: High Court backs Met Police use of facial recognition
The High Court has upheld the Metropolitan Police’s live facial recognition policy, rejecting claims that its deployment unlawfully interferes with privacy and protest rights
NLJ this week: Chatbots in the dock as AI liability questions mount
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll