header-logo header-logo

11 September 2008
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest , Damages , Fees
printer mail-detail

Damages

Field Common Ltd v Elmbridge Borough Council [2008] EWHC 2079 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 141 (Aug)

Where a landlord has been held responsible for the trespasses of its tenants, the wronged party can recover compensation in respect of the benefits that the landlord enjoyed as a result of that trespass.

The correct approach to the assessment of damages in such a case is the “hypothetical negotiation” approach (based on what the landlord would have paid on a hypothetical negotiation for the grant of the necessary rights). However, the conclusion is critically dependent on the factors which are to be taken into account in the hypothetical negotiation that is envisaged.

Issue: 7336 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest , Damages , Fees
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll