header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
11 September 2008
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest , Damages , Fees
printer mail-detail

Damages

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Field Common Ltd v Elmbridge Borough Council [2008] EWHC 2079 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 141 (Aug)

Where a landlord has been held responsible for the trespasses of its tenants, the wronged party can recover compensation in respect of the benefits that the landlord enjoyed as a result of that trespass.

The correct approach to the assessment of damages in such a case is the “hypothetical negotiation” approach (based on what the landlord would have paid on a hypothetical negotiation for the grant of the necessary rights). However, the conclusion is critically dependent on the factors which are to be taken into account in the hypothetical negotiation that is envisaged.

Issue: 7336 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest , Damages , Fees
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
NLJ this week: What the court considers when assessing refusal of ADR
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
NLJ this week: Finding innovative ways to fund the justice gap
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Two’s company, but three’s a crowd in financial provision cases
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Charities Appeals Supplement: March 2026
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll