header-logo header-logo

11 September 2008
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest , Damages , Fees
printer mail-detail

Damages

Field Common Ltd v Elmbridge Borough Council [2008] EWHC 2079 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 141 (Aug)

Where a landlord has been held responsible for the trespasses of its tenants, the wronged party can recover compensation in respect of the benefits that the landlord enjoyed as a result of that trespass.

The correct approach to the assessment of damages in such a case is the “hypothetical negotiation” approach (based on what the landlord would have paid on a hypothetical negotiation for the grant of the necessary rights). However, the conclusion is critically dependent on the factors which are to be taken into account in the hypothetical negotiation that is envisaged.

Issue: 7336 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest , Damages , Fees
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll