header-logo header-logo

Family law

11 September 2008
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Family
printer mail-detail

Re R (a child)(fact finding hearing) [2008] All ER (D) 243 (Jul)

Trial judges conducting preliminary fact-finding hearings in family law cases should never terminate the case without hearing all the available evidence and so should not accept a submission of no case to answer.

The court could only conceive of such a termination being permissible where it rested on a concession from the applicant that it was inevitable at conclusion of the hearing.

Issue: 7336 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Solicitors are installing panic buttons and thumb print scanners due to ‘systemic and rising’ intimidation including death and arson threats from clients
Ministers’ decision to scrap plans for their Labour manifesto pledge of day one protection from unfair dismissal was entirely predictable, employment lawyers have said
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll