header-logo header-logo

Family law

11 September 2008
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Family
printer mail-detail

Re R (a child)(fact finding hearing) [2008] All ER (D) 243 (Jul)

Trial judges conducting preliminary fact-finding hearings in family law cases should never terminate the case without hearing all the available evidence and so should not accept a submission of no case to answer.

The court could only conceive of such a termination being permissible where it rested on a concession from the applicant that it was inevitable at conclusion of the hearing.

Issue: 7336 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll