header-logo header-logo

Law digest: 11 September 2008

11 September 2008
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Case law
printer mail-detail

Legal Profession

Practice Direction (Court Dress) (No 5), [2008] WLR (D) 285

From 1 October 2008, all judges and members of the High Court Masters Group (which includes masters of the Chancery or Queen’s Bench Division, district judges of the principal registry of the Family Division, bankruptcy registrars and costs judges), other than circuit judges, will wear the new civil gown without a wig, or bands, wing collar/collarette. Circuit judges will wear their existing gown and lilac tippet without a wig, or bands, wing collar/collarette. Barristers or solicitors sitting in a judicial capacity will wear their practitioners’ dress without a wig. Tabs at the neck of the new civil gown will indicate the rank of judge: Court of Appeal, gold; High Court, red; members of the High Court Masters group, pink; and district judges, blue.

Issue: 7336 / Categories: Case law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll