header-logo header-logo

Family law

04 September 2008
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Family
printer mail-detail

Re N (a Child) (McKenzie Friends: Rights of Audience) [2008] EWHC 2042 (Fam), [2008] All ER (D) 116 (Aug)

A “McKenzie friend” does not, as such, have a right of audience; the court can exercise its discretion to grant a McKenzie friend a right of audience, in accordance with s 27(2)(c) of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 (CLSA 1990), “only … for good reason” and bearing in mind the “general objective” set out in s 17(1) of CLSA 1990 and the “general principle” set out in s 17(3).

The court should be very slow to grant a McKenzie friend a right of audience. But that is not to say that such an order can be made only in exceptional circumstances (save that, in the case of a “professional” McKenzie friend who acts also as an advocate, setting himself up as an unqualified advocate providing advocacy services, whether for reward or not, the court will make an order only in exceptional circumstances).

The court must remember that the overriding objective is that the courts should do justice and that legal aid is not available as readily as it was in the past. Moreover, the grant of rights of audience to a McKenzie friend may be of advantage to the court in ensuring the litigant in person receives a fair hearing.

Issue: 7335 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll