header-logo header-logo

04 September 2008
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Family
printer mail-detail

Family law

Re N (a Child) (McKenzie Friends: Rights of Audience) [2008] EWHC 2042 (Fam), [2008] All ER (D) 116 (Aug)

A “McKenzie friend” does not, as such, have a right of audience; the court can exercise its discretion to grant a McKenzie friend a right of audience, in accordance with s 27(2)(c) of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 (CLSA 1990), “only … for good reason” and bearing in mind the “general objective” set out in s 17(1) of CLSA 1990 and the “general principle” set out in s 17(3).

The court should be very slow to grant a McKenzie friend a right of audience. But that is not to say that such an order can be made only in exceptional circumstances (save that, in the case of a “professional” McKenzie friend who acts also as an advocate, setting himself up as an unqualified advocate providing advocacy services, whether for reward or not, the court will make an order only in exceptional circumstances).

The court must remember that the overriding objective is that the courts should do justice and that legal aid is not available as readily as it was in the past. Moreover, the grant of rights of audience to a McKenzie friend may be of advantage to the court in ensuring the litigant in person receives a fair hearing.

Issue: 7335 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll