header-logo header-logo

22 October 2021
Issue: 7953 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digest: 22 October 2021

Constitutional law

Attorney General and the Advocate General for Scotland - United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Incorporation) (Scotland) Bill [2021] UKSC 42, [2021] All ER (D) 16 (Oct)

The Supreme Court, in a reference to it under s 33 of the Scotland Act 1998 (the Scotland Act) by the applicants, the Advocate General, the Lord Advocate or the Attorney General in respect of two Bills passed by the Scottish Parliament in March 2021: the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Incorporation) (Scotland) Bill (the UNCRC Bill) and the European Charter of Local Self-Government (Incorporation) (Scotland) Bill (the ECLSG Bill), considered ss 6, 19(2)(a)(ii), 20(10)(a)(ii) and 21(5)(b)(ii) of the UNCRC Bill, and ss 4(1A) and 5(1) of the ECLSG Bill. Having regard to the application of ss 28 and 101(2) of the Scotland Act, the court found that ss 6, 19(2)(a)(ii), 20(10)(a)(ii) and 21(5)(b)(ii) of the UNCRC Bill and ss 4(1A) and 5(1) of the ECLSG Bill were outside the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament. Accordingly,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll