header-logo header-logo

19 March 2009
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs

Tradition (UK) Ltd v Ahmed [2009] All ER (D) 55 (Mar)

In considering the appropriate approach to take in respect of an application for costs against a professional person, there are clear parallels between the jurisdiction that has been exercised in cases involving insolvency practitioners and the jurisdiction to make wasted costs orders that the court exercises in relation to legal professionals.

The court has jurisdiction to make a wasted costs order only where the improper, unreasonable or negligent conduct complained of has caused a waste of costs, and only to the extent of such wasted costs. Demonstration of a causal link is essential.

Issue: 7361 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll