header-logo header-logo

26 June 2008
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

Prosecution Appeal (No 32 of 2007); R v N Ltd [2008] EWCA Crim 1223, [2008] All ER (D) 112 (Jun)

There is no jurisdiction for a judge to find, before the close of the prosecution case, that there was no case to answer. There is sound reason for the jurisdiction to entertain a submission that there is no case to answer to be exercised at the close of the crown case. It is then that it is known for certain what the evidence actually is. Until then, the most that can be known is what it is expected to be.

 

Issue: 7327 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law expands workplace law offering with specialist healthcare regulatory appointment

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC strengthens Dispute Resolution team with partner hire

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose announces partner promotions

NEWS
Group claims, disputed costs and judicial recruitment dominate the latest courtroom round-up
Landlords face fresh registration duties as procedural reforms reshape the civil courts
Sanctions can derail commercial disputes long before judgment, making early planning essential
Pressure is mounting for a dedicated UK AI law, but deciding what it should achieve remains the central challenge
Legal professional privilege has checked the SRA’s investigative powers, exposing difficult questions about tackling suspected abusive litigation
back-to-top-scroll