HEALTH AND SAFETY

Mason v Satelcom Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 494, [2008] All ER (D) 175 (May)

When determining whether or not someone was in “control” of equipment for the purposes of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/2306), it is necessary to ascertain, in relation to a non-employer, whether there was a purpose for which he had such control as he had. It would be wrong to hold that a person would be responsible for the suitability and maintenance of a ladder which just happened to be on their premises.

Issue: 7325 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest

HEALTH AND SAFETY

Mason v Satelcom Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 494, [2008] All ER (D) 175 (May)

Issue: 7325 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims

Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation

NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules

The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ

NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception

The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week

NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform

The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers

A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

Error message

HEALTH AND SAFETY

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

DWF—Stephen Webb

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little