header-logo header-logo

Criminal Litigation

17 April 2008
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v C [2007] EWCA Crim 2859, [2008] All ER (D) 19 (Apr)

The Court of Appeal noted that every summing up, particularly one delivered extempore, could, with hindsight, be rewritten or have other features incorporated into it.

However, that is nowhere near sufficient to demonstrate that a conviction is unsafe. A summing up is an individual creation, in which virtually everyone who hears it who is a party to a case on either side will find something that he would prefer to be expressed differently.

However, it is important to bear in mind that a summing up is not written for the Court of  Appeal, which has not heard the evidence, but rather it is written for the jury who have been  listening to the evidence. It is written for those who know, in particular, what is not disputed.

Issue: 7317 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll