header-logo header-logo

Criminal Litigation

17 April 2008
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v C [2007] EWCA Crim 2859, [2008] All ER (D) 19 (Apr)

The Court of Appeal noted that every summing up, particularly one delivered extempore, could, with hindsight, be rewritten or have other features incorporated into it.

However, that is nowhere near sufficient to demonstrate that a conviction is unsafe. A summing up is an individual creation, in which virtually everyone who hears it who is a party to a case on either side will find something that he would prefer to be expressed differently.

However, it is important to bear in mind that a summing up is not written for the Court of  Appeal, which has not heard the evidence, but rather it is written for the jury who have been  listening to the evidence. It is written for those who know, in particular, what is not disputed.

Issue: 7317 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
back-to-top-scroll