header-logo header-logo

Criminal Litigation

17 April 2008
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v C [2007] EWCA Crim 2859, [2008] All ER (D) 19 (Apr)

The Court of Appeal noted that every summing up, particularly one delivered extempore, could, with hindsight, be rewritten or have other features incorporated into it.

However, that is nowhere near sufficient to demonstrate that a conviction is unsafe. A summing up is an individual creation, in which virtually everyone who hears it who is a party to a case on either side will find something that he would prefer to be expressed differently.

However, it is important to bear in mind that a summing up is not written for the Court of  Appeal, which has not heard the evidence, but rather it is written for the jury who have been  listening to the evidence. It is written for those who know, in particular, what is not disputed.

Issue: 7317 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll