header-logo header-logo

17 April 2008
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment Law

James v London Borough of Greenwich [2008] EWCA Civ 35, [2008] All ER (D) 54 (Feb)

The question of whether or not an “agency worker” is an employee of an end user must be decided in accordance with common law principles of
implied contract and, in some very extreme cases, by exposing sham arrangements.

It is wrong to regard all “agency workers” as self-employed temporary workers outside the protection of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996); however, recent case law does not entitle all “agency workers” to argue successfully that they should all be treated as employees in disguise.

There is a wide spectrum of factual situations. Labels are not a substitute for legal analysis of the evidence. In many cases agency workers will fall outside the scope of the protection of ERA 1996 because neither the workers nor the end users were in any kind of express contractual relationship with each other and it is not necessary to imply one to explain the work undertaken by the worker for the end user.

Issue: 7317 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll