header-logo header-logo

Judicial Review

17 April 2008
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Section 31 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 is amended (by s 141 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007)

Section 31 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 is amended (by s 141 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007) to provide that if, on an application for judicial review, the High Court quashes the decision to which the application relates, it may also (i) remit the matter to the original decision-maker, with a direction to reconsider the matter and reach a decision in accordance with the findings of the High Court, or (ii) substitute its own decision for the decision in question (s 31(5)).

It may substitute its own decision only if the decision in question was made by a court or tribunal, the decision is quashed on the ground that there has been an error of law and, without the error, there would have been only one decision which the court or tribunal could have reached (s 31(5A)).

Unless the High Court otherwise directs, a decision so substituted has effect as if it were a decision of the relevant court or tribunal (s 31(5B)).

Issue: 7317 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll