header-logo header-logo

17 April 2008
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Judicial Review

Section 31 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 is amended (by s 141 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007)

Section 31 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 is amended (by s 141 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007) to provide that if, on an application for judicial review, the High Court quashes the decision to which the application relates, it may also (i) remit the matter to the original decision-maker, with a direction to reconsider the matter and reach a decision in accordance with the findings of the High Court, or (ii) substitute its own decision for the decision in question (s 31(5)).

It may substitute its own decision only if the decision in question was made by a court or tribunal, the decision is quashed on the ground that there has been an error of law and, without the error, there would have been only one decision which the court or tribunal could have reached (s 31(5A)).

Unless the High Court otherwise directs, a decision so substituted has effect as if it were a decision of the relevant court or tribunal (s 31(5B)).

Issue: 7317 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

Pillsbury—Matthew Sperry

Pillsbury—Matthew Sperry

Pillsbury expands private client and family office platform with Cadwalader partner hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll