header-logo header-logo

Judicial Review

17 April 2008
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Section 31 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 is amended (by s 141 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007)

Section 31 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 is amended (by s 141 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007) to provide that if, on an application for judicial review, the High Court quashes the decision to which the application relates, it may also (i) remit the matter to the original decision-maker, with a direction to reconsider the matter and reach a decision in accordance with the findings of the High Court, or (ii) substitute its own decision for the decision in question (s 31(5)).

It may substitute its own decision only if the decision in question was made by a court or tribunal, the decision is quashed on the ground that there has been an error of law and, without the error, there would have been only one decision which the court or tribunal could have reached (s 31(5A)).

Unless the High Court otherwise directs, a decision so substituted has effect as if it were a decision of the relevant court or tribunal (s 31(5B)).

Issue: 7317 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll