header-logo header-logo

Costs

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Business Environment Bow Lane Ltd v Deanwater Estates Ltd [2008] EWHC 2003 (TCC)

(i) Where cases are settled, it will normally not be possible to say that one or other party has been successful, and so in those cases the order will be no order as to costs; the court should not depart from the normal order unless it is in a clear position to do so on a proper basis of agreed or determined facts which enable the court to decide what other order should be made.

(ii) Rule 44.4(1)(b) permits a court to award indemnity costs where the facts of the case and/or the conduct of the parties was such as to take the case out of the norm; before such an order can be made there should normally be a significant level of unreasonableness or otherwise inappropriate conduct in that party’s pre-litigation dealings with the successful party or in relation to the institution and conduct of the litigation.

(iii) Part 44.3(5)(d) applies where a party has exaggerated his claim and is relevant where the exaggeration prevented settlement of the dispute at an early stage.

Issue: 7339 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll