header-logo header-logo

Employment Law

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

SG & R Valuation Services Co v Boudrais [2008] EWHC 1340, [2008] All ER (D) 141 (May)

The court considered the question of garden leave, holding that whether or not an employee has the right to work is to be determined by construction of the contract of employment.

The test is whether the obligation of the employer is not confined to payment of the agreed remuneration, but also includes the obligation to provide work. The factors taken into account include the uniqueness of nature of the employee’s role, the skills involved in the job and whether those skills would atrophy through lack of use, and the provisions of the particular contract of employment.

Employees who have a right to work have that right subject to the qualification that they have not, as a result of some prior breach of contract or other duty, rendered it impossible or reasonably impracticable for the employer to provide work. Any such breach of contract or other duty must constitute wrongdoing, by reason of which they will or may profit. In such circumstances, there is no obligation on the employer to provide work, even though the contract of employment is ongoing.

Issue: 7339 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll