header-logo header-logo

Criminal law

11 January 2007
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Fraud Act 2006 (Commencement) Order 2006 (SI 2006/3200):

Brings the Fraud Act 2006 (FrA 2006) into force on 15 January 2007. FrA 2006 creates a general offence of fraud which can be committed in three different ways, by:

(i) false representation;
(ii) by failing to disclose information; and
(iii) by abuse of position.

It also creates new offences of obtaining services dishonestly and of possessing, making and supplying articles for use in frauds. It contains a new offence of fraudulent trading applicable to non-corporate traders (equivalent to s 458 of the Companies Act 1985). FrA 2006 repeals the deception offences in ss 15, 15A, 16, and 20(2) of the Theft Act 1968, and ss 1 and 2 of the Theft Act 1978. See Home Office Circular 42/2006.

Issue: 7255 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll