header-logo header-logo

25 January 2007
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Criminal litigation

Revitt v DPP [2006] EWHC 2266 (Admin), [2006] All ER (D) 34 (Sep)

The onus lies on a party seeking to vacate a guilty plea to demonstrate that justice requires that this should be permitted.

If, after an unequivocal plea of guilty, it becomes apparent that the defendant did not appreciate the elements of the offence to which he was pleading guilty, it is likely to be appropriate to permit him to withdraw his plea.

Where the facts relied upon by the prosecution do not add up to the offence charged, justice will normally demand that the defendant be permitted to withdraw his plea.
 

Issue: 7257 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sharpe Pritchard—Victoria Heald-Barraclough

Sharpe Pritchard—Victoria Heald-Barraclough

Magic Circle hire strengthens Sharpe Pritchard’s infrastructure finance capability

Lewis Silkin—Iskander Fernandez

Lewis Silkin—Iskander Fernandez

Lewis Silkin adds corporate crime specialist to growing dispute resolution team

Morr & Co—Michael Charalambous

Morr & Co—Michael Charalambous

Morr Co strengthens private client team with partner appointment

NEWS
Should every solicitor found to have acted dishonestly face automatic striking off? The answer, argues John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke LLP in NLJ this week, is no 
Winning an arbitral award against a state is one thing; enforcing it is another
Can government success in court tell us whether the rule of law is healthy? 
Poorly drafted dispute resolution clauses can trigger litigation before the real dispute is even addressed
As cryptocurrency becomes mainstream, family lawyers are increasingly confronting the challenges it creates on divorce
back-to-top-scroll