header-logo header-logo

Employment Law

25 January 2007
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Thornett v Scope [2006] EWCA Civ 1600, [2006] All ER (D) 357 (Nov)

The employment tribunal’s task, when deciding what compensation is just and equitable for future loss of earnings, will almost inevitably involve a consideration of uncertainties.

Any assessment of a future loss, including one that the employment would continue indefinitely, is by way of prediction and inevitably involves a speculative element. There might be cases in which evidence to the contrary is so sparse that a tribunal should approach the question on the basis that the employment would have continued indefinitely, but where there is evidence that it might not have been so, that evidence should be taken into account.

The parties should place before the tribunal the material on which they seek to rely to establish how long the employment would have continued but for the unfair dismissal and the tribunal should scrutinise that evidence carefully.

Issue: 7257 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll