header-logo header-logo

25 January 2007
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Trademarks

Special Effects Ltd v L’Oreal SA [2007] EWCA Civ 1, [2007] All ER (D) 29 (Jan)

Decisions made in proceedings in the Trade Mark Registry against one party do not give rise to issue estoppel in subsequent legal proceedings in the High Court since the decisions of the registry are not final against the party who lost in those proceedings.

Therefore, it is not an abuse of process for the party who loses in the registry to raise similar issues in subsequent High Court proceedings between the same parties.

Issue: 7257 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers welcomes new associate

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Ward Hadaway lawyer joins Birmingham Law Society Council

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons expands Chelmsford commercial litigation team with two appointments

NEWS
Construction workers injured in comparable accidents can face sharply different routes to compensation on opposite sides of the Atlantic
Victims of undue influence may have more options than simply unwinding a tainted transaction, with courts able to order profits accounts, compensation and, exceptionally, severance
Disabled people could lose vital safeguards following the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Cheshire West test for deprivation of liberty, two barristers warn
A formidable reputation cannot protect a law firm when partner departures, fragile finances and client uncertainty begin feeding each other
Businesses incorporating open-source software into commercial products could face obligations to disclose valuable source code, with AI-assisted development making licensing risks harder to track
back-to-top-scroll