header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CIVIL LITIGATION

Fourie v Le Roux [2007] UKHL 1, [2007] All ER (D) 171 (Jan)

The grant of a freezing order, on a without notice application, would be unlikely to be properly made in the absence of any formulation of the case for substantive relief that the applicant intends to institute.

Without the issue of substantive proceedings or an undertaking to do so, the propriety of the grant of an interlocutory injunction would be difficult to defend.

An interlocutory injunction, like any other interim order, is intended to be of temporary duration, dependent on the institution and progress of some proceedings for substantive relief.

However, in suitable circumstances a freezing order may be, and often is, granted and served on the respondent before substantive proceedings have been instituted; such an order is not a nullity.

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll