header-logo header-logo

COURTS

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v Huggins [2007] All ER (D) 97 (Jan)

There is no requirement to establish, to prove a contempt of court, an intention to disrupt proceedings. The power of summary punishment is to be exercised only where necessary to protect the process of justice.

The summary procedure should be used only in exceptional cases where contempt is clearly proved and nothing else would do to protect the ends of justice. The decision to imprison a person for contempt should never be taken too quickly and there should always be time for reflection about what is the best course to take.

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Solicitors are installing panic buttons and thumb print scanners due to ‘systemic and rising’ intimidation including death and arson threats from clients
Ministers’ decision to scrap plans for their Labour manifesto pledge of day one protection from unfair dismissal was entirely predictable, employment lawyers have said
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll