header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

COURTS

R v Huggins [2007] All ER (D) 97 (Jan)

There is no requirement to establish, to prove a contempt of court, an intention to disrupt proceedings. The power of summary punishment is to be exercised only where necessary to protect the process of justice.

The summary procedure should be used only in exceptional cases where contempt is clearly proved and nothing else would do to protect the ends of justice. The decision to imprison a person for contempt should never be taken too quickly and there should always be time for reflection about what is the best course to take.

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Signature Litigation—Catherine Naylor

Signature Litigation—Catherine Naylor

International fraud and asset recovery offering boosted by partner hire

Stevens & Bolton—Alexa Payet

Stevens & Bolton—Alexa Payet

Private wealth disputes team adds contentious probate specialist

Morgan Lewis—Paul Feldberg

Morgan Lewis—Paul Feldberg

Firm strengthens investigations and sanctions capabilities with London partner hire

NEWS
Cheshire West, which established an ‘acid test’ for deprivation of liberty safeguards, has been overturned by the Supreme Court
The Chancery Division and other segments of the High Court are to be replaced by a new Business and Property Division (BPD), in a major civil justice shakeup
Law firms that hold client money will need to file annual accountants’ reports and make a declaration, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) confirmed this week
Two district judges and a tribunal judge have been sanctioned for delays in delivering judgments and orders
Private equity (PE) investment into UK law firms halved to £250m last year, but deal volume rose, according to research by Acquira Professional Services’ Momentum private equity market tracker
back-to-top-scroll