header-logo header-logo

LIMITATION

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

McCoubrey v Ministry of Defence [2007] EWCA Civ 17, [2007] All ER (D) 185 (Jan)

The question of whether an injury is significant within s 14(1)(a) of the Limitation Act 1980, as expanded in s 14(2), must be decided by reference to the seriousness of the injury, and not by reference to its effect or perceived effect on the claimant’s private life or career.

Section 14(2) requires consideration of whether the claimants ought reasonably to have appreciated that their injuries were serious. The effect of the injury on the claimant’s private life or career prospects does not impinge on the issue of whether the injury itself was sufficiently serious.

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Solicitors are installing panic buttons and thumb print scanners due to ‘systemic and rising’ intimidation including death and arson threats from clients
Ministers’ decision to scrap plans for their Labour manifesto pledge of day one protection from unfair dismissal was entirely predictable, employment lawyers have said
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll