header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CIVIL LITIGATION

Brown v Russell Young & Co [2007] EWCA Civ 43, [2007] All ER (D) 287 (Jan)

The claimants’ solicitors incurred generic costs in anticipation of the launch of group litigation, but a group litigation order was never made. There was a conditional fee arrangement (CFA) between the claimants and the solicitor, but this did not specify that generic costs were recoverable.

HELD In such circumstances, where claims settled before proceedings began and there was no opportunity for a costs-sharing order to be made, the claimants could recover generic costs under the terms of the CFA if those terms were wide enough to encompass such costs. There is no need for any additional or collateral agreement relating to generic costs.

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
Britain’s new acknowledgement that Israel’s occupation is unlawful, and accompanying settlement-goods ban and sanctions, is significant but overdue, argue Danny Friedman KC and Victor Kattan in NLJ this week
New planning fee rises, wider trade union access rights and a service-by-email trap feature in Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
back-to-top-scroll