header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CIVIL LITIGATION

Brown v Russell Young & Co [2007] EWCA Civ 43, [2007] All ER (D) 287 (Jan)

The claimants’ solicitors incurred generic costs in anticipation of the launch of group litigation, but a group litigation order was never made. There was a conditional fee arrangement (CFA) between the claimants and the solicitor, but this did not specify that generic costs were recoverable.

HELD In such circumstances, where claims settled before proceedings began and there was no opportunity for a costs-sharing order to be made, the claimants could recover generic costs under the terms of the CFA if those terms were wide enough to encompass such costs. There is no need for any additional or collateral agreement relating to generic costs.

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Paula Myers to private capital team in Leeds

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces five promotions at Birmingham office

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
Calls to raise the age of criminal responsibility from 10 to 14 have been renewed, with the Bar Council arguing the current threshold criminalises children too early and risks pushing them towards lifelong offending
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
back-to-top-scroll