header-logo header-logo

TORT

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Tamares (Vincent Square) Ltd v Fairpoint Properties (Vincent Square) Ltd [2007] EWHC 212 (Ch), [2007] All ER (D) 103 (Feb)

The court summarised the principles applicable to the assessment of damages for loss of the ability to prevent an infringement of a right to light:

(i) The court must attempt to find what would be a fair result of a hypothetical negotiation between the parties.

(ii) The context, including the nature and
seriousness of the breach, should be kept in mind.

(iii) The right to prevent a development (or part) gives the owner of the right a significant bargaining position. (iv) The owner of the right with such a bargaining position would normally be
expected to receive some part of the likely profit from the development.

(v) If there is no evidence of the likely profit, the court may award a suitable multiple of the damages for loss of amenity.

(vi) If there is evidence of the likely the profit, the court should normally award a sum which takes into account a fair percentage of the profit.

(vii) The size of the award should not be so large that the development would not have taken place had such a sum been payable.

(viii) The court should consider whether the deal feels right.

 

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

Francis Ho, Charles Russell Speechlys partner, was recently appointed chair of the Construction Law Committee of the City of London Law Society. He discusses the challenges of learning to lead, the importance of professional ethics, and the power of the written word, withNLJ

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
back-to-top-scroll