header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

TORT

Tamares (Vincent Square) Ltd v Fairpoint Properties (Vincent Square) Ltd [2007] EWHC 212 (Ch), [2007] All ER (D) 103 (Feb)

The court summarised the principles applicable to the assessment of damages for loss of the ability to prevent an infringement of a right to light:

(i) The court must attempt to find what would be a fair result of a hypothetical negotiation between the parties.

(ii) The context, including the nature and
seriousness of the breach, should be kept in mind.

(iii) The right to prevent a development (or part) gives the owner of the right a significant bargaining position. (iv) The owner of the right with such a bargaining position would normally be
expected to receive some part of the likely profit from the development.

(v) If there is no evidence of the likely profit, the court may award a suitable multiple of the damages for loss of amenity.

(vi) If there is evidence of the likely the profit, the court should normally award a sum which takes into account a fair percentage of the profit.

(vii) The size of the award should not be so large that the development would not have taken place had such a sum been payable.

(viii) The court should consider whether the deal feels right.

 

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll