header-logo header-logo

TORT

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Tamares (Vincent Square) Ltd v Fairpoint Properties (Vincent Square) Ltd [2007] EWHC 212 (Ch), [2007] All ER (D) 103 (Feb)

The court summarised the principles applicable to the assessment of damages for loss of the ability to prevent an infringement of a right to light:

(i) The court must attempt to find what would be a fair result of a hypothetical negotiation between the parties.

(ii) The context, including the nature and
seriousness of the breach, should be kept in mind.

(iii) The right to prevent a development (or part) gives the owner of the right a significant bargaining position. (iv) The owner of the right with such a bargaining position would normally be
expected to receive some part of the likely profit from the development.

(v) If there is no evidence of the likely profit, the court may award a suitable multiple of the damages for loss of amenity.

(vi) If there is evidence of the likely the profit, the court should normally award a sum which takes into account a fair percentage of the profit.

(vii) The size of the award should not be so large that the development would not have taken place had such a sum been payable.

(viii) The court should consider whether the deal feels right.

 

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll