header-logo header-logo

Civil litigation

29 November 2007
Issue: 7299 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Hoddinott v Persimmon Homes (Wessex) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 1203 [2007] All ER (D) 321 (Nov)

In CPR r 11(1), the word “jurisdiction” does not denote territorial jurisdiction but is a reference to the court’s power or authority to try a claim. Where the claim form has not been served in time, it is open to a defendant to argue that the court should not exercise its jurisdiction to try the claim.

A defendant who does not indicate on his acknowledgment of service of the claim form that he intends to dispute the jurisdiction of the court, is to be treated as having accepted that the court has jurisdiction to try the claim. An earlier application to set aside an order extending time for service of the claim form would, in the absence of such an indication, be treated as having been abandoned by reason of CPR rr 11(1)(a), 11(1)(b) and 11(5).

Issue: 7299 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll