header-logo header-logo

Civil Litigation

18 October 2007
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Bhandari v UK (App No 42341/04) [2007] All ER (D) 18 (Oct)

This case concerned the right, under Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), to have a hearing within a reasonable time.

HELD When determining the period to be taken into account in civil proceedings, the “reasonable time” begins when the action is instituted and extends to the decision which disposes of the dispute. Where there are separate sets of proceedings, those proceedings may only be considered in toto where they are inseparable and concern essentially the same dispute.

The reasonableness of the length of proceedings has to be assessed in the light of the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities, and what is at stake for the applicant in the dispute. Moreover, the state is responsible for the efficiency of its system; if a state allows proceedings to continue beyond the “reasonable time’ prescribed by Art 6(1) without doing anything to advance them, it will be responsible for the resultant delay.

Issue: 7293 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll