header-logo header-logo

18 October 2007
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment Appeal Tribunal

Sage (UK) Ltd v Bacco [2007] All ER (D) 170 (Aug)

Judge Peter Clark, with the express authority of Elias P, said (at para 17):

“I wish to make it clear that it is the responsibility of parties and their representatives to ensure that where cases are reported those reports are included in the list and copied in the bundle of authorities. The reasons are two-fold;

first, it helps the EAT, when pre-reading a case, to refer to the head note of an authority. It is not a sensible use of time to read through the entire judgment in order to assimilate the basic facts and holdings in the case.

Secondly, it is useful to the readers of our judgments to see precise references to passages in the earlier cases cited; this is often helped by reference to the relevant law report.”

Issue: 7293 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP strengthens Commercial practice with a new partner

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons welcomes Francesca Brown to Family team

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau strengthens Sheffield regulatory practice with new hires

NEWS
A wide-ranging Civil Way column highlights developments from insolvency procedure to employment law, but one case stands out for its lessons on bankruptcy, family homes and digital communications
A sprawling Intellectual Property Office battle between House of Fraser and Frasers Property has delivered a masterclass in modern trade mark law
Courts in England and Wales and Singapore are increasingly confronting complex disputes over international child relocation as families become more globally mobile
The government’s long-awaited family law reform consultation could mark a turning point for domestic abuse victims navigating financial remedy proceedings, but significant challenges remain
A new commercial court pilot giving the public access to documents used in hearings, including expert reports, is raising difficult questions about transparency and privacy
back-to-top-scroll