header-logo header-logo

Technology and Construction Court

18 October 2007
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Cundall Johnson and Partners LLP v Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust [2007] EWHC 2178 (TCC), [2007] All ER (D) 89 (Oct)

Paragraph 1 of the Pre-Action Protocol for Construction and Engineering Disputes provides that the protocol applies to all construction and engineering disputes (including professional negligence claims against architects, engineers and quantity surveyors) subject to the exceptions in para 1.2.

The issue in the present case was whether or not the protocol applied to the claimant’s fees in respect of enabling works; the claimant, a firm of consultant engineers, submitted that that claim was simply a matter of debt recovery, and thus was outwith the scope of the protocol.

HELD The claim for professional fees fell within the term “engineering disputes” in para 1.1. The fact that it might also be characterised as debt collection did not take it outside the scope of that provision. “Debt recovery” was not one of the specified exceptions in para 1.2, and claims for professional fees form a staple part of the work of the Technology and Construction Court.

Issue: 7293 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll