header-logo header-logo

EMPLOYMENT LAW

06 September 2007
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Blundell v Governing Body of St Andrew’s Catholic Primary School [2007] IRLR 652, [2007] All ER (D) 159 (May)

EMPLOYMENT LAW

The employee was a schoolteacher. She brought a sex discrimination claim when, following her return from maternity leave, she was allocated a different class to teach from the one she had taught before taking leave.

Held Construing reg 18 of the Maternity and Parental Leave Regulations 1999: the tribunal should have in mind both

(i) the purposes of the legislation, and (

(ii) the fact that the regulations themselves provide for exceptional cases—namely that where it is not reasonably practicable for the employer to permit her to return to her previous job, he may provide for her return to another job which is both suitable for her and appropriate for her to do in the circumstances.

As to

(i), the legislation seeks to ensure  that there is as little dislocation as reasonably possible in her working life, so as to avoid adding to the burdens which will  inevitably exist in her family or private life simply because she has a very young infant making new demands upon her. As to

(ii), even given that the purpose of the legislation is to protect the employee, there is no need to construe “same job” as covering a broad spectrum of work to ensure an  appropriate balance between employer and employee. “Job” can be quite specifically defined. Latitude is provided by an employer being able to provide a job which is not the same job, but is nonetheless suitable (per Langstaff J at para 56).

Issue: 7287 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll