header-logo header-logo

12 July 2007
Issue: 7281 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Sentencing

R (Gulliver) v Parole Board [2007] All ER (D) 63 (Jul)

When considering the recall to prison of a prisoner who has been released on licence, the parole board is not confined to a review of secretary of state’s reasons for recall, but is entitled to take into account all relevant circumstances.

The secretary of state’s power to recall a prisoner on licence is not limited to cases where there is a breach of a licence condition but can be for other reasons, such as the protection of the public.

There may be exceptional cases in which it might be appropriate to apply for judicial review of the secretary of state’s decision to recall the prisoner, but they would be few and far between. 

Issue: 7281 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Sheffield expansion continues with appointment of commercial property partner

Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan

Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan

Browne Jacobson strengthens banking and finance practice with latest partner appointment Paul Duggan

Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott

Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott

Employment partner joins Ward Hadaway

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll