header-logo header-logo

Sentencing

28 June 2007
Issue: 7279 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v Harries [2007] All ER (D) 48 (Jun)

Neither s 234 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA 2003) nor the provisions of the CJA 2003  (Commencement No 8 and Transitional and Saving Provisions) Order 2005 (SI 2005/950) empower a court to impose a sentence on an individual as though the offence had been committed after 5 April 2005 (the commencement date of the dangerousness provisions of CJA 2003), merely because the dates on the relevant count straddle that date.

In a case where a count on an indictment spans the commencement date, the court should not impose any penalty under ss 224 to 229 unless it is satisfied that at least one relevant offence was committed after the  commencement date. Once it is so satisfied, the mere fact that the count on the indictment has been framed in such a way to straddle the commencement date would not prevent the court applying, if appropriate, the dangerousness provisions for that offence.

Even if it is not open to the court to invoke the dangerousness provisions in respect of offences committed before the commencement date, if there are qualifying offences committed after it, those committed before might have some bearing on the issue of dangerousness or the determination of the minimum term.

Issue: 7279 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll