header-logo header-logo

31 May 2007
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL EVIDENCE

DPP v Chand [2007] EWHC 90 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 64 (Jan)

The principle laid down in R v Hanson [2005] EWCA Crim 824, [2005] All ER (D) 380 (Mar), that the appellate court will not interfere with the judge’s judgment about the capacity of prior events to establish propensity—under s 101 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003—unless the decision is plainly wrong, or discretion has been exercised unreasonably in the Wednesbury sense, applies equally to the Divisional Court when considering an appeal against a decision of a magistrates’ court.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll