header-logo header-logo

31 May 2007
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL EVIDENCE

DPP v Chand [2007] EWHC 90 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 64 (Jan)

The principle laid down in R v Hanson [2005] EWCA Crim 824, [2005] All ER (D) 380 (Mar), that the appellate court will not interfere with the judge’s judgment about the capacity of prior events to establish propensity—under s 101 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003—unless the decision is plainly wrong, or discretion has been exercised unreasonably in the Wednesbury sense, applies equally to the Divisional Court when considering an appeal against a decision of a magistrates’ court.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
A High Court ruling has sent a jolt through the legal profession after a newly qualified solicitor used an internal AI tool to produce court correspondence containing a fabricated legal citation
A significant data privacy ruling has clarified what counts as valid consent under UK data protection law
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
back-to-top-scroll