header-logo header-logo

31 May 2007
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

R v Denton [2007] EWCA Crim 1111, [2007] All ER (D) 192 (Apr)

The Court of Appeal considered judicial interventions and questions in a trial on indictment in light of the guidance given in R v Sharp [1994] QB 261, [1993] 3 All ER 225 (per Lord Justice Stuart-Smith at page 273). 

HELD Judges must be free to clarify the true state of the evidence. There can be no fixed rules about when it is appropriate for a judge to intervene. All must depend on the facts of the individual case. Sustained questioning by the judge should be embarked on only with caution, having regard to the need for judicial restraint and the preservation both of impartiality and the appearance of impartiality. It does not however follow that even judicial interventions which of themselves might raise an eyebrow necessarily result in an unfair trial or an unsafe conviction. Such interventions or questions must be considered in the context of the evidence as a whole, of the conduct of the trial as a whole and also with regard to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll