header-logo header-logo

31 May 2007
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Landlord and Tenant

Lay v Drexler [2007] EWCA Civ 464, [2007] All ER (D) 318 (May)

Where a landlord applies for the grant of a new tenancy under s 24(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, and the tenant, having entered an  acknowledgement of service indicating an intention to take a new lease in response to the landlord’s application, subsequently terminates the proceedings by service of a notice under s 25(9) indicating that he no longer wants a new tenancy, the normal rule about costs in CPR 38.6(1) applies, and so the tenant should pay the costs of the entire proceedings to the landlord.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll