header-logo header-logo

08 July 2010
Issue: 7425 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

European law

R v Budimir and Rainbird (Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport intervening) [2010] EWCA Crim 1486, [2010] All ER (D) 269 (Jun). Interfact Ltd v Liverpool City Council [2010] EWHC 1604 (Admin)

In the decentralised system of the EU legal order, rights of individuals under EU law were given effect principally through national courts. In the absence of EU rules on the subject, EU law left to the domestic legal system of each member state the designation of the courts having jurisdiction and the rules governing proceedings intended to secure rights conferred by EU law.

However, national law was not given an entirely free hand in such matters. The applicable national rules would have to comply with two conditions. First, they would have to not be less favourable than those governing similar domestic actions (the principle of equivalence). Secondly, they would have to not render the exercise of rights conferred by Community law impossible or excessively difficult.

The principle of effectiveness resulted directly from the application of the principles of supremacy and direct effect in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll