header-logo header-logo

08 July 2010
Issue: 7425 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

European law

R v Budimir and Rainbird (Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport intervening) [2010] EWCA Crim 1486, [2010] All ER (D) 269 (Jun). Interfact Ltd v Liverpool City Council [2010] EWHC 1604 (Admin)

In the decentralised system of the EU legal order, rights of individuals under EU law were given effect principally through national courts. In the absence of EU rules on the subject, EU law left to the domestic legal system of each member state the designation of the courts having jurisdiction and the rules governing proceedings intended to secure rights conferred by EU law.

However, national law was not given an entirely free hand in such matters. The applicable national rules would have to comply with two conditions. First, they would have to not be less favourable than those governing similar domestic actions (the principle of equivalence). Secondly, they would have to not render the exercise of rights conferred by Community law impossible or excessively difficult.

The principle of effectiveness resulted directly from the application of the principles of supremacy and direct effect in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Nelson Wang

HFW—Nelson Wang

HFW strengthens global insurance practice and Greater China offering with London Partner hire

Burges Salmon—David McEwing

Burges Salmon—David McEwing

Burges Salmon boosts Energy and Utilities practice with appointment of David McEwing

Browne Jacobson—Alexander Studholme

Browne Jacobson—Alexander Studholme

Browne Jacobson adds international construction arbitration partner in London push

NEWS
A former senior judge has warned peers against scrapping juries for fraud and financial crimes, ahead of the Courts and Tribunals Bill’s second reading in the House of Lords this week
Civil practitioners face changes spanning debt recovery, workplace harassment and possession claims, alongside guidance on insolvency challenges and children proceedings

Finding matrimonial wealth is as challenging as dividing it, as family disputes draw practitioners into asset tracing, offshore structures and insolvency

Agreement between opponents offers no guarantee that a court will approve a retrospective increase to a costs budget
Climate change belongs on every lawyer’s agenda, with risks extending far beyond environmental practice into commercial advice, litigation and access to justice
back-to-top-scroll