header-logo header-logo

23 March 2007
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR ORDERS

M v DPP [2007] All ER (D) 74 (Mar)

(i) The terms of any prohibition in an anti-social behaviour order (ASBO) must be precise, clear and certain, and no wider than necessary. Where a clause is too broad, it cannot stand.

(ii) It is wrong to regard the requirements of the Magistrates’ Courts (Hearsay Evidence in Civil Proceedings) Rules 1999 (SI 1999/681) as mere formalities.

However, where the substance of the evidence has been provided to the defendant’s solicitors in sufficient time before the hearing, and there is no prejudice to the defendant, it is open to the justices to hold that it is not in the interests of justice for there to be an adjournment for the serving of a formal notice.

Issue: 7265 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll