header-logo header-logo

12 August 2010
Issue: 7430 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

Chalbury McCouat International Ltd v P.G. Foils Ltd [2010] EWHC 2050 (TCC), [2010] All ER (D) 34 (Aug)

When parties agreed to arbitrate, the court should strive to give effect to that intention and should seek to support the arbitral process. Where there was an arbitration clause, it was not any part of the court’s function to designate or determine the seat of arbitration.

That was a matter which, if disputed by the parties, would have to be determined by the arbitral tribunal once appointed. Although there was no statutory guidance as to the degree or type of connection required under s 2(4) of the Arbitration Act 1996, a party should not generally bring proceedings in relation to an arbitration except in the courts of the jurisdiction of the seat of arbitration. Further, there would be sufficient “connection” if the proper law of the contract was English law.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll