header-logo header-logo

23 October 2008
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Property
printer mail-detail

Construction

Benfield Construction Ltd v Trudson (Hatton) Ltd [2008] EWHC 2333 (TCC)

Pursuant to cl 39A.7.1 of the JCT standard form, the parties cannot seek a further decision by an adjudicator if the dispute has already been the subject of a decision by an adjudicator. The extent to which a decision is binding will depend on an analysis of the extent of the dispute and the terms, scope and extent of the decision made by the adjudicator. It is necessary to ask whether or not the dispute is the same, or substantially the same, as the original dispute.

Issue: 7342 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll