header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 12 September 2025

12 September 2025
Issue: 8130 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Anonymity orders

PMC (a child by his mother and litigation friend FLR) v Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board [2025] EWCA Civ 1126

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, ruled on an appeal against the decision of Mr Justice Nicklin refusing the claimant’s application for an anonymity order (AO). The court considered significant matters regarding the jurisdictional basis for granting AOs and reporting restriction orders (RROs) in civil proceedings, particularly in personal injury cases involving children and protected parties. The court clarified the existence of a limited common law power to derogate from the open justice principle by making withholding orders (WOs) and RROs in specific circumstances where necessary to ensure justice. The decision addressed the judgment of Nicklin J, who refused the AO on the basis that evidence did not support a withholding order in this case, which the claimant had appealed. The court ruled that while previous publicity concerning the case existed, it did not preclude granting an AO in prospective terms to protect the claimant’s privacy and vulnerability. Dartford

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

Charity strengthens leadership as national Pro Bono Week takes place

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Dual-qualified partner joins London disputes practice

McDermott Will & Schulte—Karen Butler

McDermott Will & Schulte—Karen Butler

Transactions practice welcomes partner in London office

NEWS
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll