header-logo header-logo

12 September 2025
Issue: 8130 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 12 September 2025

Anonymity orders

PMC (a child by his mother and litigation friend FLR) v Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board [2025] EWCA Civ 1126

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, ruled on an appeal against the decision of Mr Justice Nicklin refusing the claimant’s application for an anonymity order (AO). The court considered significant matters regarding the jurisdictional basis for granting AOs and reporting restriction orders (RROs) in civil proceedings, particularly in personal injury cases involving children and protected parties. The court clarified the existence of a limited common law power to derogate from the open justice principle by making withholding orders (WOs) and RROs in specific circumstances where necessary to ensure justice. The decision addressed the judgment of Nicklin J, who refused the AO on the basis that evidence did not support a withholding order in this case, which the claimant had appealed. The court ruled that while previous publicity concerning the case existed, it did not preclude granting an AO in prospective terms to protect the claimant’s privacy and vulnerability. Dartford

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll