header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 12 September 2025

12 September 2025
Issue: 8130 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Anonymity orders

PMC (a child by his mother and litigation friend FLR) v Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board [2025] EWCA Civ 1126

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, ruled on an appeal against the decision of Mr Justice Nicklin refusing the claimant’s application for an anonymity order (AO). The court considered significant matters regarding the jurisdictional basis for granting AOs and reporting restriction orders (RROs) in civil proceedings, particularly in personal injury cases involving children and protected parties. The court clarified the existence of a limited common law power to derogate from the open justice principle by making withholding orders (WOs) and RROs in specific circumstances where necessary to ensure justice. The decision addressed the judgment of Nicklin J, who refused the AO on the basis that evidence did not support a withholding order in this case, which the claimant had appealed. The court ruled that while previous publicity concerning the case existed, it did not preclude granting an AO in prospective terms to protect the claimant’s privacy and vulnerability. Dartford

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll